When launching your own project on the Internet, the question of its implementation often arises. What is better to use for this, because modern providers and numerous companies offer their profitable services. The question also becomes relevant, and what is better to choose, a regular or a virtual server. Of course, the latter option is considered most often, and you need to understand what this is connected with.
A virtual private server (VPS) is a type of hosting where one physical server is divided into several isolated virtual environments. Each client receives a dedicated share of system resources — CPU, RAM, and storage — which ensures stable performance and independence from other users. This solution is ideal for businesses, developers, and website owners who need more control, flexibility, and security than shared hosting can provide. The geographical location of the VPS also plays an important role, as it affects connection speed, latency, and access to local networks. Therefore, choosing the right server location can significantly improve site performance and user experience.
The peculiarity of VPS is that the client does not have physical hardware, so there is no need to purchase and install equipment, update programs and hire a staff of specialists. All work is the responsibility of the provider, and you just need to pay for its services.
In order to implement everything, you need physical equipment that is installed in the provider’s data center. And already there virtual servers are being developed, which the user receives for his project.
If we consider shared hosting with a physical and virtual server, then the first option is easier to implement. The supplier does everything, and the client only pays. Administration is also not the concern of the client. But in some cases, this may be a drawback, since the rights are limited and there is no way to install additional software.

But it is important to know some disadvantages: